Skip navigation.

SHAFR Blogs

The Peace Prize in Historical Perspective

by Molly Wood

On October 9, 2009, the Norwegian Nobel Committee announced the recipient of this year’s Nobel Peace Prize: President Barack Obama.  The initial reaction was largely one of surprise, followed quickly by criticism.  Some suggested that Obama should turn down the prize.  Others began to interpret the award as a non-too-subtle indictment of former President George [...]

Diplomatic History in the Bush Era

by John Prados

Apart from all the other excesses of the Bush Years there may be special problems for diplomatic history and historians. To some degree this is rooted in the changing dynamics of international relations but it also has a policy aspect. When the diplomatic history of the presidency of George W. Bush comes to be written [...]

U.S. HIV Travel and Immigration Ban is Going… Going… Almost Gone

by Laura Belmonte

In a long overdue move, the U.S. government is about to lift the 1987 ban that precludes people with HIV from traveling in or immigrating to the United States. The story of the HIV travel ban illuminates how disease, domestic politics, and notions of sexuality and morality can inform U.S. foreign policy – and shows [...]

« View Older Posts

news

9/4/09: SHAFR Annual Elections Underway read more…

9/1/09: SHAFR Announces Search for Conference Consultant read more…

9/1/09: SHAFR.org Unveils New Blogging Team for Fall 2009 read more…

9/1/09: SHAFR Opportunities in 2010 read more…

Featured this month

Teaching Research
Syllabus:
The Nuclear World
Diplomatic History :
The Sino-American Normalization: A Reassessment
Lesson Plan: Call for Lesson Plans Passport : Accessing Records at Modern Presidential Libraries
Classroom Document:
Dollar Bill
Financial Award:
W. Stull Holt Dissertation Fellowship

SHAFR Op-Eds

Process, Policy, and the Burdens of History in Latin America

by Dustin Walcher

After three months in office, Barack Obama traveled to Trinidad and Tobago in April 2009 to attend the Fifth Summit of the Americas.  Already his presidency had been consumed by issues of major importance, both at home and abroad; Obama no doubt spent his days thinking about the global economic crisis, wars in Iraq and Afghanistan, and consequential domestic priorities such as the upcoming push for health reform.  On that future day when the Obama presidential library opens its archives, we should not be surprised to learn that top policymakers were not poring over Latin American affairs during their first weeks in office. Read more…

To Whom is a Drone Loyal?

by Mary Dudziak

Cross-posted from Balkinization
Originally posted on September 27, 2009

In my west coast copy of the New York Times today, two stories are side-by-side: one on disagreements within the Obama Administration about Afghanistan, and one titled U.S. Drone Strikes Office of Sunni Party In Iraq’s North.” These stories are related, for the politics of war, necessarily at issue in presidential decisionmaking about Afghanistan, are affected by the technologies of warfare. Drones are a technological step that further isolates the American people from military action, undermining political checks on contemporary warfare. And the isolation of the people, historians of war have argued, helps enable on-going, endless war.

When contemplating the scope and limits of presidential war power, constitutional scholars tend to focus on the relationship between the branches and the impact of public opinion. But the existence of drones, the reliance on private contractors, and the absence of a draft are part of a shift in the political structure of American warfare, enabling presidential power.

The role of drones might cause us to believe that an inevitable march of technology, together with strategies of contemporary warfare, have led to the disconnect between most Americans and the wars their nation is engaged in. But military historian Adrien Lewis suggests that these developments were not at all inevitable, and that a fundamental shift in the political structure of American warmaking has occurred since Vietnam, resulting in an isolation of the people from their wars. Read more…

Legacies of Drift

by Daniel Byrne

Over the past several months, the United States has confronted continually the problems of the Horn of Africa in the form of Somali pirates, political instability, and the rising threat of Al-Qaida.  Daring rescues, supportive resolutions, and assassinations of terrorist leaders have formed the major part of the U.S. response.  Although these decisive actions emerged out of immediate crises, they remain part of a long pattern of drift in American policy towards Africa and its decolonization over the past half-century.    The pattern of inaction, disinterest, and inconsistency followed by crisis management with a quick return to somnolence clearly emerges in the history of U.S.-Somali relations. Read more…

« View Older Essays