Skip navigation.

SHAFR Opinion

Why Do We Fight in Afghanistan?

by Susan Brewer

More people have been asking that question lately. For years Americans have been told that despite setbacks we are making progress there. Making progress toward what, people wonder. What is the mission of the United States in Afghanistan? After more than a decade since the launch of Operation Enduring Freedom, it is worth revisiting what [...]

A Center-Left Leader, Missed Opportunities, and Anti-Americanism: A Possible new Direction in U.S. Policy Towards the Western Hemisphere?

by James Siekmeier

I received an email from a former colleague and friend of mine recently who concluded that Lula’s (Luiz Inácio Lula de Silva) two terms in office as President of Brazil (2003-2010) represented a missed opportunity for the United States–and United States-Latin American relations in general. Here was a center-left leader, in one of the world’s [...]

A New Cold War at the Water’s Edge?

by Andrew Johnstone

An essential rule for politicians: always make sure the microphone is off.  On March 26 at the Nuclear Security Summit in Seoul, Barack Obama was overheard discussing missile defence with Russian President Dmitri Medvedev. With an open mic, Obama told Medvedev “This is my last election. After my election I have more flexibility.”[1] Russia currently [...]

Is the System the Solution? Past Policies, Current Dilemmas, and Inter-American Relations in the 21st Century

by James Siekmeier

More than 20 years have passed since the last full-fledged U.S. military intervention in Latin America (Panama, 1989, in case your memories are hazy).  Starting in the 1980s, democratization flowered in the region for numerous reasons—but mostly internal reasons based in Latin American history and society. Starting in the 1990s, with the end of the [...]

Visions of War

by Susan Brewer

On December 15th President Barack Obama welcomed home U.S. troops from a war he once had called “dumb.” His speech avoided the reasons why the Iraq War was fought and focused instead on honoring the American servicemen and women who fought it.  Inspiring words–“extraordinary achievement,” “honor,” “sacrifice,” “finest fighting force,” “unbroken line of heroes,” “progress [...]

Newt Gingrich and the (ab)Uses of History

by Andrew Johnstone

It is an honor to join the SHAFR blogging team for 2011-12.  While SHAFR is (as the name makes perfectly clear) a society that focuses on the history of American foreign relations, there is no doubt that we are as well placed as anyone to make connections between historical events and contemporary issues in American [...]

Issues for the 2012 Presidential Election

by Nick Sarantakes

The United States of America is about to enter a presidential election year.  Actually, it already has entered the political season.  The election of 2012 will most likely turn on economics, but as Andy Johns pointed out in his blog, foreign policy is always important and next year’s contest will be no different.  In addition, [...]

« View Older Posts

Ernest H. Crosby, “The Real ‘White Man’s Burden’”

The New York Times published this response to Rudyard Kipling’s “The White Man’s Burden” in 1899.  In “The Real ‘White Man’s Burden,’” Crosby offers an alternate vision of American imperialism.  Where Kipling trumpeted the benefits of American civilization, Crosby emphasizes the corrupting effects of modernization. -M. B. Masur, St. Anselm College

Ernest H. Crosby, “The Real ‘White Man’s Burden,’” New York Times February 15, 1899, p. 6.

Bibliography

Robert L. Beisner, Twelve against Empire: The Anti-Imperialists, 1898-1900 (New York: 1968)

Frank A. Ninkovich, The United States and Imperialism (Malden, Massachusetts, 2001).\

Anders Stephanson, Manifest Destiny American Expansionism and the Empire of Right (New York, 1995).

Discussion Questions

What is Crosby’s view of colonialism?  How does Crosby characterize Western “civilization”?

Compare Crosby’s letter to the New York Times with Kipling’s poem.  Which poem more effectively anticipated America’s experiences as an imperial power?

How do the two poems correspond to debates about the costs and benefits of American expansion in the late 19th and early 20th centuries?

rnest H. Crosby, “The Real ‘White Man’s Burden’”

New York Times February 15, 1899, p. 6

Introduction

The New York Times published this response to Rudyard Kipling’s “The White Man’s Burden” in 1899. In “The Real ‘White Man’s Burden,’” Crosby offers an alternate vision of American imperialism. Where Kipling trumpeted the benefits of American civilization, Crosby emphasizes the corrupting effects of modernization.

Bibliography

Robert L. Beisner, Twelve against Empire: The Anti-Imperialists, 1898-1900 (New York: 1968)

Frank A. Ninkovich, The United States and Imperialism (Malden, Massachusetts, 2001).

Anders Stephanson, Manifest Destiny American Expansionism and the Empire of Right (New York, 1995).

Discussion Questions

What is Crosby’s view of colonialism? How does Crosby characterize Western “civilization”?

Compare Crosby’s letter to the New York Times with Kipling’s poem. Which poem more effectively anticipated America’s experiences as an imperial power?

How do the two poems correspond to debates about the costs and benefits of American expansion in the late 19th and early 20th centuries?

Leave a Reply

XHTML: You can use these tags: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>