Skip navigation.

SHAFR Opinion

Germany to Greece: Drop Dead

by William Glenn Gray

Germans have chosen to work; Greeks have chosen leisure. For this reason, Germans are furious with Greece for accumulating an unsustainable debt burden and thereby undermining the solidity of the European currency. But the self-righteous anger in Berlin may itself call into question the political basis of the Euro.

Diplomats Among Warriors

by John Prados

In Afghanistan at the moment (February 2010), U.S. Marines, allied troops, and Afghan government soldiers are embarked on an offensive at a town called Marja in Helmand province. American commander-in-chief General Stanley A. McChrystal here makes the first expression of the strategy that underlies the appeal for reinforcements that led to the Obama administration “surge” [...]

Is Wartime a Time to End Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell?

by Mary Dudziak

As the Obama Administration moves (slowly) toward repeal of Don’t Ask Don’t Tell, one argument in opposition is that the nation is at war, and significant changes in the military should not take place during wartime. One response to that point is that all hands are needed during heightened military deployments, and it harms American [...]

Beware Presidents’ Use of History

by John Prados

We are told that history plays as tragedy and repeats as farce. But perhaps that is changing. In the summer of 2007 President George W. Bush invoked the Vietnam analogy to justify an equally or more tragic war in Iraq. And in the West Point speech announcing his new strategy for Afghanistan, President Barack Obama [...]

The State Department Wants You! (or does it?)

by Molly Wood

In October 2007, presidential candidate Barack Obama promised a new approach to American foreign policy.  “It’s time to make diplomacy a top priority,” he announced.  “Instead of shuttering consulates, we need to open them in the tough and hopeless corners of the world. Instead of having more Americans serving in military bands than the diplomatic [...]

Afghanistan and the Chinese Civil War

by William Stueck

Any political historian will tell you that government decisionmakers frequently use historical analogies in making up their minds and that, more often than not, they do so badly.   And Kimber Quinney reminded us in her thoughtful November 9 commentary that historians are not immune to employing such analogies either, or in doing so badly.
Yet as [...]

Twenty Years On: Merkel in Washington

by William Glenn Gray

Twenty years after the fall of the Berlin Wall, the idea of creating new structures for a post-Cold War world is still quite radical. German Chancellor Angela Merkel’s approach represents a familiar way of doing business, one that continues to bank on the essential unity of “the West.” But is it effective?

« View Older Posts

What would happen if Kim Jong-il tested a Nuke and the United States Didn’t Notice?

May 25th, 2009

Okay, President Kim, so you’re really ticked off at my failure to comment on your prior shinanigans on the SHAFR blog. You win. I’m finally going to advise the Obama administration on how to respond to your recent, alleged, test of a nuke, and in public on the SHAFR blog.

Darth Cheney to the contrary notwithstanding, it’s been no secret for some time that the initiation of military action by the United States against the North Korean homeland was not a serious possibility. Does that mean that the only alternative is U.S. compromise with a regime that perpetually alters its positions and actions once its agreements are tested by specific conditions and courses of action? I don’t think so.

One alternative is to count on China’s and Russia’s common interest in avoiding a nuclear arms race in northeast Asia to contain North Korea’s nuclear program. After all, do China and Russia really want North Korea to sell nukes and missiles to Islamic terrorists? Do they really want to see Japan, South Korea, and (omigod, China!) Taiwan  to develop nuclear weapons? I don’t think so.

As the United States experiences “relative decline,” or the “rise of the rest,” it only seems fair, not to mention practical, to expect rising powers to bear an increasing share of the burden of managing the least responsible actors in the international system. Surely the United States can (should) continue to maintain forces in South Korea and Japan, as well as its military alliances with those countries, and to strike militarily in any instance in which North Korea clearly seeks to transfer its nuclear capability to other parties. Beyond that, it is about time that others did their fair share to restrain North Korea.

North Korea is devilishly rational in acting upon the assumption that the United States is desperate that it not become a nuclear power, but not so desperate as to take military action against its homeland. It’s time to call President Kim’s bluff, and let China and Russia do their share. Absolute security is not a realistic option in the real world. If the United States can accept that fact, it has a far better chance of dealing with North Korea effectively than if it does not.

President Kim, do your thing! The United States has more important issues on its plate.

Tags: , ,

About William Stueck
William Stueck is Distinguished Research Professor at the University of Georgia. He is currently writing a history of U.S.-Korean relations. He is the author of, among other works, Rethinking the Korean War (Princeton University P, 2002) and The Korean War: An International History (Princeton U, 1995).

Leave a Reply

You must be logged in to post a comment.